Tug On This
Tuesday, January 11, 2005
  Book Burning Burning
Ok. This happens every year when a bunch of idiot, that's right I said IDIOT parents suddenly decide that some of the books their kid's schools are assigning are "bad" or "offensive" or "dirty." Unfortunately, many of these books are also "classics" or "watersheds" or "books that every living person on the planet should be forced to read and discuss."

Here in Kansas City two school distircts in two affluent suburbs -- one on the Kansas side and one on the Missouri side -- are embroiled in book banning piccadiloes right now. Both the Blue Valley and Blue Springs school boards are hearing parents complain about "terrible, offensive" books like Toni Morrison's "Song of Solomon," and Kurt Vonnegut's "Slaughterhouse-Five." During the news story I watched last night about this debacle, I also caught the cover of (drum roll here) "Catcher In The Rye."

I can't believe I didn't see "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer" in there along with "Are You There God? It's Me Margaret" but I'm sure they were both soaking in a bucket of lighter fluid while the cameraman was shooting the B-roll for the story.

Most of the parents I saw were concerned about the language, racism, war and sex in these novels. Unfortunately, they don't seem to be concerned by the things their kids can learn about language, racism, war and sex from reading these books, they only want to make sure they don't read them, and consequently, don't learn.

So ban the books school districts. Don't worry, there are libraries around the world that will still have them. You can also go to Read Print. It's a free online library that hosts full copies of tons of the classics. Thankfully, they are adding more every week.

And, kids, if you still want to read these books your parents are terrified of, you can come on over to my house. By my count I have read and own 20 or so of the most attacked books of all time. You can borrow my copy.

Or better yet, maybe we'll sit in a room and read it together. And after that, we can discuss it. What a novel -- no pun intended -- concept.

Shame on you lazy, idiot parents. Your kids are already learning everything you don't seem to want them to know from MTV. As you ban these books, I sincerely suggest banning the box, as well. As far as McTighe HaĆ¼s goes, I've got two boys, one is a toddler, one is an infant. When they grow up, they can read any book they like. If I'm concerned about its content (which I won't be) I will read it with them and we'll talk about it together.

In fact, I may just go out right now and get a couple of copies of "The Catcher In The Rye" and put them on their bookshelves next to "The Cat In The Hat" and the various Thomas The Tank Engine books. Why? Because I, for one, will be offended if my sons DON'T read these books.

To tell Blue Valley to leave the reading list alone visit Blue Valley School District.To tell Blue Springs, visit Blue Springs School District.
 
Comments:
You are the man!
{{{{{CLAPS}}}}
 
It's infuriating. I read in the paper today that this group does not consider what they are doing "censorship" or "book banning." Rather they say they just believe there are "better choices" out there. When asked what the greatest book of all time was, the answer was, predictably, "The Bible."

I haven't read "All The Pretty Horses" which is one of their big examples of an inappropriate book. Apparently the "F" word is dropped in liberally. So, you know, I can't say whether or not that is a book that ought to be on a high school reading list or not. But hold that thought.

But this woman running the show on this effort said that "Lord of the Flies" was "depressing" and that there were "better choices." Someone else said that these children shouldn't have to be exposed to "negative imagery" Okay, well that rules out MacBeth. And Romeo and Juliet. Better get those off the shelves. Oh wait, both those plays are kinda sexy, too! And Romeo and Juliet encourages disobedience to one's parents. Shameful. Yep, get Shakespeare out. It should also be noted that Hamlet has occult overtones.

By their own standards, most of the great works would be banned. But instead, they are (smartly) running their PR machine on easier targets like "All the Pretty Horses." And they are not using the words "banned" or "censored." But since, as I understand it, a parent can request an alternate book anyway...I guess I don't see their point. An anti-intellectual parent can already sheild their child from these works. So...why do these parents feel the need to make a choice for all children in the school. Oh, that's right...they want a Theocracy.

Make no mistake, this is a slippery slope they are pushing folks down. This is a first step. Not a last one. You let 'em ban "All the Pretty Horses" you can pretty much forget "All's Well That Ends Well" (Too much cross dressing). You can also count on the fact that the theatre department won't perform "Oklahoma" either. Ado Annie isn't an abstinence message.

The January Family
thejanuaryfamily.blogspot.com
 
...please where can I buy a unicorn?
 
Die ausgezeichnete Mitteilung ist))) wacker levitra vs viagra cialis levitra wirkungseintritt [url=http//t7-isis.org]levitra preis[/url]
 
I refuse.
 
Very curious topic
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Mainly I've been driving. Alfa Romeo. First to four in under sixty. Seconds. Gears. Dig it.

Name:
Location: Kansas City, Missouri, United States
ARCHIVES
December 2004 / January 2005 / February 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / February 2006 / March 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / May 2007 / July 2007 / December 2007 /


Powered by Blogger